Saturday, April 6, 2013

Major Storm Brewing (heavy rain, severe storms, heavy wet snow western High Plains)


Melt Baby Melt

"I wish I could be right half the time and still get paid!" No need to get defensive, Paul. Just smile, shake his hand - tell him still you're right more often than politicians, stock brokers and economists. It's a pretty good gig - just not this year.

A year ago lawns were green, flowers were in bloom, boats were in the water, on our way to a 7 month boating season. In Minnesota? How do you top that?

You don't.

Our Slow Motion Spring is aggravating; Mother Nature toying with our mental health. Yesterday I stood by the window, muttering "melt, baby melt.". That's just kind of sad, but I sense I'm not alone.
There's still 15-20 inches of snow on the ground up north. One benefit of our March-like April: slower snow melt, which may help to reduce the flood risk in the Red River Valley a bit. That, and it's too chilly for severe storms & tornadoes. Hey, that's something.

The sun makes a brief cameo appearance today before more rain tonight & Monday. It doesn't look quite as wet this week; a major Plains storm brushes us with a cold rain late Tuesday & Wednesday; maybe mixing with wet snow by Thursday.

Yes, the drought is easing, but summer warm fronts are nowhere in sight.
 
Lingering Uncertainty. Most of the models still bring significant moisture northward across the Plains this week; a potential for an inch or more of precipitation (mostly rain) in the Twin Cities. The local NWS office is predicting about .7" of additional rain by Tuesday evening. But the European (ECMWF) model still keeps the brunt of the moisture to our south.

 
QPF. I think the latest Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (talk about a mouthful) has the right idea, keeping the heaviest rainfall plume south of Minnesota and Wisconsin; as much as 2-4" from northern Missouri to Illinois and Indiana, closer to 1" over the southern half of Minnesota by Friday.
 
On The Other Hand. The latest NAM model prints out about 1" of rain for the Twin Cities by Wednesday morning, with a smear of heavier precipitation over northern Minnesota, some 2-3" liquid amounts for the western Dakotas, falling as mostly snow. It's the March That Wouldn't End.
 
Good News For Therapists. Your billable hours just went up, especially if you live in the Red River Valley or the Dakotas, where some 10-20" snowfall amounts are predicted by Wednesday by the latest NAM model. No snow for the Twin Cities into at least midweek.
A Real Storm? The GFS pulls an intense storm northeastward across the Plains, spreading potentially significant rain into Minnesota Tuesday and Wednesday; a clearing trend by late week (with cooler than average temperatures). Again, a significant north-south temperature gradient across the USA is setting the stage for potentially significant rain in the weeks to come.

 
Mental Health Day on Thursday? It's too early to panic, but the ECMWF (Euro) model is still suggesting enough cold air in the lowest mile of the atmosphere for rain ending as wet snow (in the Twin Cities) by Thursday. Highs reach the 50s Monday before cooling down later in the week - no more spring-worthy warm fronts are brewing looking out 10 days or so.
 
Impact Based Warnings. Minnesota is one of 14 states that will see new, enhanced wording of tornado warnings, to try to better reflect and communicate the risks to consumers in the potential path. Details from NOAA's Central Region: "An experimental National Weather Service warning enhancement will be used across much of the central U.S. this thunderstorm season (beginning April 1). This is an expansion of a smaller NWS experiment that began in Kansas and Missour in 2012. The Impact Based Warning (IBW) experimental product is an effort to better communicate severe weather threats within National Weather Service warnings. While the basic function of Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado warnings will remain the same, additional enhanced information will be provided within the warning to provide additional expected "impact" information. The goals are to provide more information through the warnings in order to facilitate improved public response and decision making, and to better meet societal needs in the most life-threatening weather events. This effort is in response to key findings from recent service assessments of devastating tornadoes in 2011, particularly the EF-5 tornado in Joplin, MO..."
 
 
NOAA Needs Your Help. The local Twin Cities National Weather Service is interested in knowing whether the ground is still frozen in your neighborhood. Why does this matter? The extent and depth of lingering frost in the ground will help to determine rainfall run-off rates next week, when we may see a significant storm. This will impact not only the potential for minor flash flooding in the Twin Cities, but more significant river flooding, especially on the Red River in the weeks to come. Details: "As we head in to Spring, potential flooding is a primary concern across Minnesota and Wisconsin.  We could use your help in determining if the ground is still frozen, or if there has been some partial thaw of the ground.  As you can see on the map below, we have quite a large area with no data across southern MN and western WI.  Visit our Facebook Page or send us a message via Twitter @NWSTwinCities and let us know what the ground condition is like at your location."

Median Lake Ice Out Dates. The interactive map above shows median dates when most of the ice is off Minnesota's lakes. For Nokomis the date is April 5. Not this year. Map courtesy of the Minnesota DNR.

Scary Numbers. Data from the Minnesota Climate Office reminds us just how harsh 1983 was in the Twin Cities. That "spring" we picked up a whopping 21.8" of snow during April. I had just arrived in Minnesota the previous month to work at WTCN-TV (now KARE-11), and I remember wondering what I had gotten myself into. Yes, it can always be worse.

HydroClim Update. Here are a few bullet points from the latest update, courtesy of the Minnesota State Climate Office and the Minnesota office of the DNR:
  • Snow depths range from zero in the southern one-third of Minnesota to over 20 inches west central Minnesota, north central Minnesota, and in the Lake Superior highlands.
    [see: NWS Snow Depth Estimation Map  |  Snow Depth Maps]
  • The amount of water content in the snow pack is estimated to be in excess of five inches in some west central and north central Minnesota counties. The large amount of water on the landscape, lying upon an impervious frozen surface, has led to a high risk for major flooding in the Red River basin.
    [see: NWS Snow Water Equivalent Estimation Map]
  • The U.S. Geological Survey and Minnesota DNR report that stream discharge values vary widely across the state. After the initial flush of snow melt runoff recedes, stream discharge values will quickly fall below historical medians unless there is a very wet spring.
    [see: USGS Stream Flow Conditions  |  MNDNR Weekly Stream Flow Maps and Tables]
  • Water levels on most Minnesota lakes are low due to the dry summer and autumn of 2012. Lake Superior's water level is approximately one foot lower than its historical average for this time of year.
* latest modeled snow depth from NOAA is here.

Weather, Disaster Agencies Turn To Twitter, Facebook, YouTube. Bill McAuliffe at The Star Tribune takea look at The Star Tribune takes a look at social media's impact on weather coverage, specifically severe storm tracking and communication. As I say in the article, I suspect it's a mixed blessing: nice to have more information, but be sure you're following "trusted sources" to get reliable, actionable information. Here's an excerpt: "With the season for quick-hitting storms about to barge into Minnesota, social media are about to become a key news tool. Indeed, public agencies concerned with natural disasters are glomming onto social media like so many teenagers, attracted to its instant, two-way connectivity. “It’s fast. It’s direct. It enhances our ability to deliver the message,” said Bruce Gordon, director of communications for the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, whose 12 public information officers post breaking news, safety tips and even human interest stories on Facebook, Twitter and YouTube..."




Climate Stories....


No Debate In The Scientific Community. Graph above courtesy of Greg Laden at scienceblogs.com.

How U.S. Energy Policy Fails To Address Climate Change. The Christian Science Monitor reports; here's an excerpt: "What never gets asked and answered definitively in the policy debate is this: What should our ultimate goal be and when should we aim to achieve it? The first part of the question has elicited so many answers from so many constituencies that I may not be able to represent them all here. But here is an attempt to categorize the main lines of thinking concerning the country’s energy goals:
  1. Seek the cheapest price for energy with the implication that environmental consequences should not be tallied as part of the cost.
  2. Complete a transition to renewable energy as quickly as possible while drastically reducing the burning of fossil fuels.
  3. Replace all fossil fuel energy with nuclear power..."
Photo credit above: "Wind turbines of the Smoky Hill Wind Farm dot the countryside near Ellsworth, Kan. Perhaps the simplest way to manage the energy transition we must undergo would be to impose a high and ever rising tax on carbon, Cobb writes." Orlin Wagner/AP/File

Global Warming: 1,600 Years Of Ice In Andes Melted In 25 Years. Here's an excerpt from frenchtribune.com :  "Providing one of the signs of global warming, glacial ice in the Peruvian Andes has started melting. A structure that took 1,600 years to build has fallen into the grip of high temperatures and melted within 25 years. The research has been conducted by Lonnie G. Thompson, the Ohio State University glaciologist. According to him, his team has worked from time to time on the Quelccaya ice cap for decades. Findings have been published in a paper that has been released online. Global warming is one of the results of man-made activities. This recent report has highlighted that the problem of global warming has reached its peak. This time the proof has been provided by margins of the Quelccaya ice cap in Peru..."

Even Doubter Wants To Prepare For Global Warming. Mother Nature News has the article; here's the intro: "Some still insist that climate change is a hoax, but the vast majority of Americans believe the globe is warming, a new survey finds — and they want to prepare for the worst. In fact, even 60 percent of climate-change doubters favored preparations, the survey found. Researchers collected opinions between March 3 and March 18 via an online questionnaire, using a nationally representative sample of 1,174 American adults, both English and Spanish speaking. The survey asked about climate-change beliefs and support for adaptation strategies to help coastal areas cope with the rising sea levels and frequent, intense storms that a warmer world could bring. The results showed that 82 percent of Americans are in favor of preparation..."

Photo credit above: "Sea level rise is swamping coasts. Rodanthe in the Outer Banks of North Carolina is pictured."(Photo: Andrew Kemp, Yale University)

Federal Study: Global Warming Means More "Extreme" Rains. Basic physics: warm up the atmosphere, even by a few degrees, and you increase the capacity of the sky overhead to hold more water vapor (which is itself another greenhouse gas). The result? More fuel for extreme rains (and snows). The Hill has the story; here's the intro: "Global warming will make cases of “extreme” rainfall even more intense and worsen flood risks, federal researchers say in the latest warning that climate change will likely worsen violent weather. A new federally led study explores how growing amounts of atmospheric water vapor due to global warming will affect what is called probable maximum precipitation. The report, released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, forecasts an “accelerated water cycle with heavier extreme rains.” The study shows “a 20-30 percent expected increase in the maximum precipitation possible over large portions of the Northern Hemisphere by the end of the 21st century if greenhouse gases continue to rise at a high emissions rate,” NOAA said..."

Photo credit above: "The flooded Red River surrounds houses near Fargo, N.D., in 2010. Scientists say climate change will produce more intense storms, increasing the risk of damaging floods." (M. Spencer Green / Assoicated Press / March 21, 2010)

* The Los Angeles Times has another perspective on the potential for more extreme rains here.

Rising Seas Swallow 8 Cities In These Climate Change GIFS. Mashable has the story; here's an excerpt: "Climate change and global warming may cause sea levels to rise and flood coastal cities across the world. Over the past century, the Global Mean Sea Level has risen by 4 to 8 inches. And according to estimates by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (PDF), it will keep rising between 8 inches and 6.6 feet by 2100. How will the world look if that happens? In November of 2012, The New York Times published interactive maps displaying the effects of the sea level rising, in a series titled "What Could Disappear?" The maps show how much land the sea will claim in the future, if it rises by 5, 12, and 25 feet. Nickolay Lamm, a 24-year-old researcher and artist saw the interactive maps and wondered: "What would this actually look like in real life?" Lamm told Mashable in an email interview that "the only imagery I had of sea level rise came from Hollywood." So he decided to put his skills to work..."

Spring Leaf-Out Comes 6 Days Earlier Than It Did In 1982. Here's an excerpt of some new research from Climate Central that caught my eye: "...The map shows that leaves are coming earlier in some parts of the country, like the Rocky Mountains and Appalachians, but that spring leaf-out has been delayed over time in parts of the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest. This is consistent with climate research that shows that many types of plants have not been blooming uniformly earlier over time. We looked at the difference between when this time arrived during the first five years and the last five years of the study. In the Minneapolis area, this date is coming about six days earlier on average since 1982. Rising temperatures may actually be behind the way this date shifts in both directions. New research suggests that the response of spring leaves to warming temperatures may not be linear, due to the effects of reduced winter chilling, and increased vulnerability to late-winter freezes. A continuing trend of warming winters may lead to further changes in the familiar timing of the seasons..."

Friday, April 5, 2013

A 40-60 Minute Tornado Warning by 2020? Potential for Severe Storm Outbreak Early Next Week


Pushing The Envelope

I'm at a Severe Storms & Doppler Conference in Des Moines, focused on best practices for tornado prediction. We've made progress: advanced lead-time for tornadoes has gone from 6 minutes in the 70s to 13 minutes today. Predicting polygon tracks means fewer people have to be warned, cutting down on confusion. But the false alarm rate is still 75 percent. In other words, 3 out of 4 warnings don't produce an actual tornado.

NOAA will use more emphatic wording in 2013, especially when there is confirmation of a tornado on the ground. Expect to hear words like "catastrophic", even "you could be killed if you aren't in a basement or underground shelter" if there is a large, violent tornado on the ground, moving into a populated area. New, high-res models, capable of a 40-60 minute tornado probability, are probably 4-8 years away. Hospitals and businesses may get advance notice of a high probability of tornadoes before general consumers, giving them more time to prepare, move patients and employees, etc. The WSR-88D "NEXRAD" Doppler radars are almost 25 years old, and at some point they will be replaced, possibly with "phased-array radars" that can take a 3-D snapshot of the atmosphere within seconds vs. minutes, speeding up the tracking and warning process.

One problem: many people still wait to get confirmation from multiple sources (TV, radio, apps, a phone call) before they do the right thing and head for shelter. Waiting for confirmation can cost you your life; apathy and delay (along with a lack of basements) resulted in 161 deaths from Joplin's EF5 tornado on May 22, 2011.

A major severe outbreak is shaping up for the Southern Plains early next week. Closer to home the risk of Red River flooding will rise in coming weeks.

Rain is likely today, but a major southern storm may drop over 1" rain Monday & Tuesday; possibly ending as midweek slush.

Something to look forward to.

 
Major Severe Storm Outbreak Next Week? All the dynamics are coming together for a potentially significant outbreak of severe storms and tornadoes the first half of next week. D4 refers to Monday, D5 is Tuesday, the green area shaded D6 spills into Wednesday of next week. Low-level moisture, severe instability and a strong jet streak rotating around a deep trough of low pressure could set the stage for a series of large, violent, long-track tornadoes. Map above: SPC.

 
NOAA Needs Your Help. The local Twin Cities National Weather Service is interested in knowing whether the ground is still frozen in your neighborhood. Why does this matter? The extent and depth of lingering frost in the ground will help to determine rainfall run-off rates next week, when we may see a significant storm. This will impact not only the potential for minor flash flooding in the Twin Cities, but more significant river flooding, especially on the Red River in the weeks to come. Details: "As we head in to Spring, potential flooding is a primary concern across Minnesota and Wisconsin.  We could use your help in determining if the ground is still frozen, or if there has been some partial thaw of the ground.  As you can see on the map below, we have quite a large area with no data across southern MN and western WI.  Visit our Facebook Page or send us a message via Twitter @NWSTwinCities and let us know what the ground condition is like at your location."

Median Lake Ice Out Dates. The interactive map above shows median dates when most of the ice is off Minnesota's lakes. For Nokomis the date is April 5. Not this year. Map courtesy of the Minnesota DNR.


Scary Numbers. Data from the Minnesota Climate Office reminds us just how harsh 1983 was in the Twin Cities. That "spring" we picked up a whopping 21.8" of snow during April. I had just arrived in Minnesota the previous month to work at WTCN-TV (now KARE-11), and I remember wondering what I had gotten myself into. Yes, it can always be worse.

Dueling Models. The uncertainty over next week's forecast is even greater than usual. Most of the U.S. and Canadian models bring very significant rain north as an intense area of low pressure pushes across the Plains into the Upper Mississippi River Valley, maybe a couple inches of rain nearby. But the (normally reliable) ECMWF/European model keeps the heaviest rain just south of Minnesota, bringing showery rains in Monday, maybe a rain-snow mix by Thursday. It's too early for specifics, but here are some of the model solutions. Graphic above: Iowa State.

Full Latitude Storm. We haven't seen this for some time. The GFS spins up a major storm over the Central Plains early next week, pushing a shield of heavy rain (and possible T-storms) northward. The availability of Gulf moisture coupled with the slow forward motion of the storm could spell out significant amounts of rain, changing to wet snow across the Dakotas. Map above valid midnight Tuesday night of next week courtesy of WSI.

GEMS Model. The Canadian model has a similar solution, not quite as intense, but showing a surge of southern moisture pushing into Minnesota Monday - Wednesday of next week, possibly ending as wet snow from the Dakotas into portions of western and central Minnesota. WSI model data above valid next Tuesday evening.

European Solution. The ECMWF keeps the brunt of the moisture south of Minnesota, just brushing southern counties with a cold rain next Tuesday, a second surge next Thursday bringing rain and even a period of wet snow. I normally lean toward the "Euro", but all the U.S. and Canadian models are suggesting a more northward track, so I suspect we may wind up with more rain than the ECMWF is printing out. We'll see.

High Bust Potential. That's meteorological slang for "there's much that can go wrong with this forecast". Confidence levels are low for next week, but the ECMWF guidance (above) for MSP shows mostly light showers today, heavier rain late Sunday into Monday morning, with next week's storm tracking too far south for heavy rain across most of Minnesota. A period of rain/snow is predicted for next Thursday. Let's hope the Euro is wrong on this call.

Close To Throwing In The Towel On April. What happened to the 60s Paul? Good question. That's what I want to know too. After a few runs/row of 60s after April 18 the latest GFS run keeps us chilly (40s, maybe some 50s) into at least April 21. Wet and cool. Maybe May will be better.

Red River Flooding Likely To Peak After Mid-April In Fargo-Moorhead Area, USGS Says. INFORUM has the story; here's an excerpt: "Peak flooding on the Red River in the Fargo-Moorhead metro area will likely occur sometime after April 15, according to the U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service. USGS stream gauges indicated that on Wednesday the Red still had not begun its spring rise. That means this year’s flood will be much later than the large floods of 2009 and 2011. This year’s flood also likely will be later than the 1997 flood, which was exacerbated by an early April blizzard, USGS predicts. “The large floods at Fargo that have previously occurred in April – 1952, 1965, 1969, 1979, and 1997 – peaked from April 15 to April 19,” said Gregg Wiche, director of the USGS North Dakota Water Science Center. “Above-normal snowpack and cold March temperatures have contributed to this year’s late melt...”

HydroClim Update. Here are a few bullet points from the latest update, courtesy of the Minnesota State Climate Office and the Minnesota office of the DNR:
  • Snow depths range from zero in the southern one-third of Minnesota to over 20 inches west central Minnesota, north central Minnesota, and in the Lake Superior highlands.
    [see: NWS Snow Depth Estimation Map  |  Snow Depth Maps]
  • The amount of water content in the snow pack is estimated to be in excess of five inches in some west central and north central Minnesota counties. The large amount of water on the landscape, lying upon an impervious frozen surface, has led to a high risk for major flooding in the Red River basin.
    [see: NWS Snow Water Equivalent Estimation Map]
  • The U.S. Geological Survey and Minnesota DNR report that stream discharge values vary widely across the state. After the initial flush of snow melt runoff recedes, stream discharge values will quickly fall below historical medians unless there is a very wet spring.
    [see: USGS Stream Flow Conditions  |  MNDNR Weekly Stream Flow Maps and Tables]
  • Water levels on most Minnesota lakes are low due to the dry summer and autumn of 2012. Lake Superior's water level is approximately one foot lower than its historical average for this time of year.
* latest modeled snow depth from NOAA is here.

Criticism After Sandy Leads To Changes In The Way Hurricane Warnings, Watches Are Issued. Technically, Sandy wasn't a hurricane (warm core storm) when it hit New Jersey and metro New York. NOAA discontinued Hurricane Warnings, which caused many coastal residents to lower their guard a little. Big mistake. Changes are coming, as documented in this Washington Post story; here's an excerpt: "...Under the new policy, the hurricane center in Miami will continue to put out warnings and advisories if a storm threatens people and land, even if a hurricane or tropical storm loses its name and becomes something different. “Our forecasters now have more flexibility to effectively communicate the threat posed by transitioning tropical systems,” said Louis Uccellini, the director of the National Weather Service, which is part of the National Hurricane Center. “Sandy’s forecast was remarkably accurate and under a similar situation in the future, forecasters will be able to choose the best option to underscore the urgency involved...”



Climate Stories....


Federal Study: Global Warming Means More "Extreme" Rains. Basic physics: warm up the atmosphere, even by a few degrees, and you increase the capacity of the sky overhead to hold more water vapor (which is itself another greenhouse gas). The result? More fuel for extreme rains (and snows). The Hill has the story; here's the intro: "Global warming will make cases of “extreme” rainfall even more intense and worsen flood risks, federal researchers say in the latest warning that climate change will likely worsen violent weather. A new federally led study explores how growing amounts of atmospheric water vapor due to global warming will affect what is called probable maximum precipitation. The report, released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, forecasts an “accelerated water cycle with heavier extreme rains.” The study shows “a 20-30 percent expected increase in the maximum precipitation possible over large portions of the Northern Hemisphere by the end of the 21st century if greenhouse gases continue to rise at a high emissions rate,” NOAA said..."

Photo credit above: "The flooded Red River surrounds houses near Fargo, N.D., in 2010. Scientists say climate change will produce more intense storms, increasing the risk of damaging floods." (M. Spencer Green / Assoicated Press / March 21, 2010)

* The Los Angeles Times has another perspective on the potential for more extreme rains here.

Rising Seas Swallow 8 Cities In These Climate Change GIFS. Mashable has the story; here's an excerpt: "Climate change and global warming may cause sea levels to rise and flood coastal cities across the world. Over the past century, the Global Mean Sea Level has risen by 4 to 8 inches. And according to estimates by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (PDF), it will keep rising between 8 inches and 6.6 feet by 2100. How will the world look if that happens? In November of 2012, The New York Times published interactive maps displaying the effects of the sea level rising, in a series titled "What Could Disappear?" The maps show how much land the sea will claim in the future, if it rises by 5, 12, and 25 feet. Nickolay Lamm, a 24-year-old researcher and artist saw the interactive maps and wondered: "What would this actually look like in real life?" Lamm told Mashable in an email interview that "the only imagery I had of sea level rise came from Hollywood." So he decided to put his skills to work..."


Spring Leaf-Out Comes 6 Days Earlier Than It Did In 1982. Here's an excerpt of some new research from Climate Central that caught my eye: "...The map shows that leaves are coming earlier in some parts of the country, like the Rocky Mountains and Appalachians, but that spring leaf-out has been delayed over time in parts of the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest. This is consistent with climate research that shows that many types of plants have not been blooming uniformly earlier over time. We looked at the difference between when this time arrived during the first five years and the last five years of the study. In the Minneapolis area, this date is coming about six days earlier on average since 1982. Rising temperatures may actually be behind the way this date shifts in both directions. New research suggests that the response of spring leaves to warming temperatures may not be linear, due to the effects of reduced winter chilling, and increased vulnerability to late-winter freezes. A continuing trend of warming winters may lead to further changes in the familiar timing of the seasons..."

Keystone XL Stirs Montana Farmer's Climate And Crop Concerns. Huffington Post reports; here's an excerpt: ".."In terms of carbon emissions, Alberta tar sands are among the worst of the worst," said John Abraham, an engineering profesor at the University of St. Thomas. The other problem, he added, is the massive quantity of that crude oil. A study published last year in Nature Climate Change found that if all the oil in Alberta was harvested -- now only a theoretical possibility unless new technology emerges as fracking did for tapping previously hard-to-reach reserves of natural gas -- global temperatures would rise nearly 0.4 degrees Celsius (about 0.7 F), without taking into account emissions from energy used during the extraction, upgrading and refining of the heavy crude. That figure is arguably significant in the context of keeping any increase in global temperatures below the 2-degrees Celsius benchmark world leaders have agreed is critical for avoiding the most dangerous effects on the climate system. The planet has already warmed by 0.8 degrees Celsius..." (graphic: U.S. State Department).

Thursday, April 4, 2013

Perpetual March: Wetter Pattern (wet snow potential northern states into next week)


Perpetual March

This is a test. This is only a test. Can you keep your sense of humor, in spite of the S-word being tossed around in early April? Will you crumble under pressure, or be stoic, brave and forgiving?

It feels like The March That Wouldn't End. Before you tell me what to do with my Doppler, long range guidance is (consistently) bringing a real warm front into Minnesota the 3rd week of April, a shot at 60F after April 16. Yes, we may turn a big corner in about 10 days. In the immortal words of Dan Rather: courage.

Clouds increase later today; showery rains likely tonight into Saturday. The ECMWF (European model) is wetter than U.S. models for tomorrow, hinting at .50 inches of rain. The same model shows another surge of rain arriving Wednesday & Thursday of next week, possibly mixed with wet snow north/west of MSP as a storm tracks north across the Plains. It's too early for specifics; right now I suspect it'll be just warm enough for mostly-rain.

NOAA expects the Red River to crest after April 15. A worst case scenario: sudden warmth coupled with heavy rain, accelerating snowmelt and run-off on frozen ground. We can't rule that out; Red River residents need to stay alert.

Trending Wetter. As I've been mentioning for a few days, models are hinting at a considerably wetter pattern, starting Saturday, spilling over into next week. About .2 to .5" of rain falls Saturday, but much more significant amounts are possible next week as a slow-moving storm pushes north across the Plains, fortified with moisture from the Gulf of Mexico. Graph: Iowa State.

April Snowmobiling. And cross-country skiing, and assorted snowball battles? Head up to Lake Superior's North Shore, where Saturday's storm may drop more than 4-6" of snow, with up to 8"+ over the U.P. of Michigan. Yes, I'm enjoying "spring".

Slow Motion Spring (And A Possible Winter Relapse). I'm not buying it yet, but the ECMWF is suggesting a rain-snow mix next Wednesday, changing over to mostly rain by Thursday before skies dry out by next weekend. Accumulating snow the second week of April? Not unheard of, and at the rate we're going this year nothing much would surprise me.

Cautious Optimism About The Drought. Will rain fall after frost entirely leaves the ground? Let's hope so, but the trends are somewhat encouraging. ECMWF guidance valid next Wednesday evening shows an intensifying storm over the Central Plains, Gulf moisture streaming north, fueling an expansive shield of rain (and some wet snow).

Hope Springs Eternal. GFS guidance shows chilly weather into next weekend, followed by moderation the third week of April, maybe a shot at 60F after April 18? I know - I'll believe it when I see it.

Red River Flooding Likely To Peak After Mid-April In Fargo-Moorhead Area, USGS Says. INFORUM has the story; here's an excerpt: "Peak flooding on the Red River in the Fargo-Moorhead metro area will likely occur sometime after April 15, according to the U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service. USGS stream gauges indicated that on Wednesday the Red still had not begun its spring rise. That means this year’s flood will be much later than the large floods of 2009 and 2011. This year’s flood also likely will be later than the 1997 flood, which was exacerbated by an early April blizzard, USGS predicts. “The large floods at Fargo that have previously occurred in April – 1952, 1965, 1969, 1979, and 1997 – peaked from April 15 to April 19,” said Gregg Wiche, director of the USGS North Dakota Water Science Center. “Above-normal snowpack and cold March temperatures have contributed to this year’s late melt...”

HydroClim Update. Here are a few bullet points from the latest update, courtesy of the Minnesota State Climate Office and the Minnesota office of the DNR:
  • Snow depths range from zero in the southern one-third of Minnesota to over 20 inches west central Minnesota, north central Minnesota, and in the Lake Superior highlands.
    [see: NWS Snow Depth Estimation Map  |  Snow Depth Maps]
  • The amount of water content in the snow pack is estimated to be in excess of five inches in some west central and north central Minnesota counties. The large amount of water on the landscape, lying upon an impervious frozen surface, has led to a high risk for major flooding in the Red River basin.
    [see: NWS Snow Water Equivalent Estimation Map]
  • The U.S. Geological Survey and Minnesota DNR report that stream discharge values vary widely across the state. After the initial flush of snow melt runoff recedes, stream discharge values will quickly fall below historical medians unless there is a very wet spring.
    [see: USGS Stream Flow Conditions  |  MNDNR Weekly Stream Flow Maps and Tables]
  • Water levels on most Minnesota lakes are low due to the dry summer and autumn of 2012. Lake Superior's water level is approximately one foot lower than its historical average for this time of year.
* latest modeled snow depth from NOAA is here.

Nagging Drought Concerns. The Twin Cities metro area has picked up 4.23" of liquid precipitation (rain and melted snow) since January 1, more than half an inch above average. So the trends are encouraging - sadly, little of that moisture will do any good replenishing soil moisture, due to a thick layer of frost in the ground. We're heading into a wetter pattern, but will the storms continue after frost leaves the ground? Let's hope so. Map above showing precipitation during the last week of March courtesy of USDA.

Soil Temperatures. USDA data shows soil temperatures still in the 30s across most of Minnesota. Wheat can't develop until soil temperatures surpass 40F, corn needs consistent soil temperatures above 50F, which is still a few weeks away.

Looking Back At The April 3-4, 1974 Super Outbreak. U.S. Tornadoes has a good summary of the tornado outbreak that shocked the USA in the spring of 1974 (and helped to get me interested in meteorology). Here's an excerpt: "The “Super Outbreak of April 3-4, 1974” occurred across portions of the Midwest, Lower Mississippi Valley, and Southeast.  In what was the worst tornado outbreak of the 20th century, there were 148 tornadoes over the course of just 18 hours, almost half of which were classified as significant/strong at F2 strength or higher. Many comparisons have been made between this outbreak and the April 25-28, 2011 outbreak which featured 358 tornadoes.  Although the more recent outbreak featured many more tornadoes, they occurred over a longer time period in an age of better tornado detection, and the worst was confined to a smaller area compared to April 3-4, 1974..."

Graphic credit above: "Comparison of tornadoes F/EF3 or higher in 1974 and 2011." Chart by Kathryn Prociv.


Criticism After Sandy Leads To Changes In The Way Hurricane Warnings, Watches Are Issued. Technically, Sandy wasn't a hurricane (warm core storm) when it hit New Jersey and metro New York. NOAA discontinued Hurricane Warnings, which caused many coastal residents to lower their guard a little. Big mistake. Changes are coming, as documented in this Washington Post story; here's an excerpt: "...Under the new policy, the hurricane center in Miami will continue to put out warnings and advisories if a storm threatens people and land, even if a hurricane or tropical storm loses its name and becomes something different. “Our forecasters now have more flexibility to effectively communicate the threat posed by transitioning tropical systems,” said Louis Uccellini, the director of the National Weather Service, which is part of the National Hurricane Center. “Sandy’s forecast was remarkably accurate and under a similar situation in the future, forecasters will be able to choose the best option to underscore the urgency involved...”

The 12 Cell Phones That Changed Our World Forever. Wired.com takes a good, long walk down memory lane. Remember the "brick phone"? Oh, I was so proud to have one of these tethered to my car. What was I thinking? "Motorola engineer Martin Cooper made telecommunications history when he placed the first cellphone call 40 years ago. And who did he call, you ask? His rivals at Bell Labs, of course. Oh snap! Still, it took another decade for the mobile phone to reach the masses, because Motorola didn’t make the DynaTAC available until March 1983. And in an example of just how quaint the tech business was back then, Motorola had a press event 10 years before the phone was on sale. Which brings us to April 3, 1973, when the company that eventually brought us the Razr and Droid introduced the mobile phone. Forty years later, we’re still dropping calls like bad habits and struggling to get a signal inside a supermarket. Not that it matters, because we rarely use our phones to make phone calls. Instead, they’re a gateway to our digital lives, a means of doing everything from sending texts to updating our status to posting photos and listening to music. Thousands of phones have come and gone, and most of them seem to run on Android. But the number of handsets that could be called truly groundbreaking is surprisingly small. Here they are. Yeah, yeah, we’ve probably missed your favorite. And you’ll probably tell us about it in a comment typed on your phone....





photo above: Steve Burns.

Climate Stories....


Spring Leaf-Out Comes 6 Days Earlier Than It Did In 1982. Here's an excerpt of some new research from Climate Central that caught my eye: "...The map shows that leaves are coming earlier in some parts of the country, like the Rocky Mountains and Appalachians, but that spring leaf-out has been delayed over time in parts of the Southeast, Northeast and Midwest. This is consistent with climate research that shows that many types of plants have not been blooming uniformly earlier over time. We looked at the difference between when this time arrived during the first five years and the last five years of the study. In the Minneapolis area, this date is coming about six days earlier on average since 1982. Rising temperatures may actually be behind the way this date shifts in both directions. New research suggests that the response of spring leaves to warming temperatures may not be linear, due to the effects of reduced winter chilling, and increased vulnerability to late-winter freezes. A continuing trend of warming winters may lead to further changes in the familiar timing of the seasons..."


Keystone XL Stirs Montana Farmer's Climate And Crop Concerns. Huffington Post reports; here's an excerpt: ".."In terms of carbon emissions, Alberta tar sands are among the worst of the worst," said John Abraham, an engineering profesor at the University of St. Thomas. The other problem, he added, is the massive quantity of that crude oil. A study published last year in Nature Climate Change found that if all the oil in Alberta was harvested -- now only a theoretical possibility unless new technology emerges as fracking did for tapping previously hard-to-reach reserves of natural gas -- global temperatures would rise nearly 0.4 degrees Celsius (about 0.7 F), without taking into account emissions from energy used during the extraction, upgrading and refining of the heavy crude. That figure is arguably significant in the context of keeping any increase in global temperatures below the 2-degrees Celsius benchmark world leaders have agreed is critical for avoiding the most dangerous effects on the climate system. The planet has already warmed by 0.8 degrees Celsius..." (graphic: U.S. State Department).

Clouds Helped Enhance Greenland's Record Melting. Here's an excerpt of a very interesting story at Climate Central: "When scientists saw melting across a whopping 97 percent of Greenland’s icy surface last summer, they were quick to note that such an event is rare, but not unprecedented. The last time it happened was in 1889, so while manmade global warming is clearly involved it isn’t necessarily the entire story. A new new report in Nature on Wednesday has now helped flesh out the explanation: data from Summit Station, at the frozen island’s highest point, 10,551 feet above sea level, show that unusually warm temperatures in the region were enhanced by a blanket of low-level clouds that trapped extra heat from the Sun..."

Graphic credit above: "Extent of surface melt over Greenland's ice sheet July 8, 2012 (left) and July 12, 2012 (right), melting shown in pink." Courtesy of NASA.


Economist Warns of "Radical" Climate Change, Millions At Risk. Alarmist climate hype? I sure hope so. AFP has the story - here's the intro: "The author of an influential 2006 study on climate change warned Tuesday that the world could be headed toward warming even more catastrophic than expected but he voiced hope for political action. Nicholas Stern, the British former chief economist for the World Bank, said that both emissions of greenhouse gas and the effects of climate change were taking place faster than he forecast seven years ago. Without changes to emission trends, the planet has roughly a 50 percent chance that temperatures will soar to five degrees Celsius (nine degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial averages in a century, he said. "We haven't been above five degrees Centigrade on this planet for about 30 million years. So you can see that this is radical change way outside human experience," Stern said in an address at the International Monetary Fund..." (Image: NASA).

"The Whole Story Of Climate" Book Throws Climate Change A Curveball. Huffington Post has the story - here's an excerpt: "...In a fascinating new book -- The Whole Story of Climate: What Science Reveals About the Nature of Endless Change by Prometheus Books -- Peters explains how the media and politicians have distorted the facts on climate change, have come to the wrong conclusions on its causes, and have failed to prescribe real antidotes to the runaway greenhouse gases that are building up in the earth's atmosphere.

The Hype of Sustainability
Early on, Ms. Peters tears away at the misguided belief that if we develop sustainable technologies and change human behavior it will prevent the globe from "flipping" into the next Ice Age. It will not. We have delayed the latter some ticks of the geological clock, but we can't stop climate change, because that is what the earth has been doing for millions of years -- long before people walked upright..."